The Long Way
Merced County

Merced River Hatchery

Snelling, Merced County, California. Chinook salmon facility.

Details

Map. Snelling, Merced County, California. Larger map
Where
4998 Robinson Road, Snelling, CA 95369. Directions
When
Fish ladder usually opens to spawning fish October 1.
Season
Fish ladder normally opens around October 1.
Getting there
From Merced head north on Highway 59. Turn right onto Snelling Road. Turn left onto Robinson Road. Turn left onto gravel canal bank prior to crossing over it. Follow canal road about 3 miles following signs to the Merced River Hatchery.
Hours
Open 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Access
Public restrooms are available.
Walk-in or reserve
Open to the public; no reservation mentioned.
Phone
(209) 563-6410
Website
wildlife.ca.gov
Managed by
CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game) operates and maintains the hatchery, funded by CDFG and the Department of Water Resources.
Established
1970.

The last three miles to the Merced River Hatchery run along the gravel bank of an irrigation canal. From Merced the route goes north on Highway 59, right onto Snelling Road, left onto Robinson Road, and left again onto the canal bank just before the road crosses it. From there the visitor follows signs. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife calls the place “a little tricky to find.”

At the end of the road the Merced River comes out below Crocker-Huffman Dam, the point past which salmon cannot climb. The hatchery sits immediately downstream, about 15 miles northeast of Merced in Merced County. It is open to the public from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and has views of the river and the wildlife that uses it, along with public restrooms. The fish ladder usually opens to spawning fish on October 1.

Fall Chinook at the ladder

The hatchery spawns, rears and releases fall-run Chinook salmon of Merced River origin. A 2012 statewide hatchery review, reprinted by the department, lists fall Chinook as the only species reared here. The review calls the program experimental: its releases test how the survival of young fish to adulthood varies from one release site to another.

The production goal is to take two million eggs and release one million smolts, each about 80 millimeters in fork length, between late April and mid-May. Some fish are released at the hatchery and others at points on the lower Merced, on the San Joaquin River, and farther downstream. A constant quarter of them have the adipose fin clipped and carry a coded wire tag.

Returning adults enter through the ladder of the old spawning channel. A 1989–90 annual report describes the trap built into it: a fyke entrance, two basket hoists, an anaesthetic tank, a sorting table, and holding pens. That season the trap opened October 23 and the first salmon arrived November 5. The count ended at 82 fish. The same report records 927 visitors, with tours given to organized groups and schools.

A loop of gravel, 1970

Salmon “had all but vanished from the river during the mid-1960’s,” Robert S. Menchen of the Department of Fish and Game wrote in 1971. The main cause was low fall flows. In some years there was too little water even for spawners to ascend the river, and spawning gravel was scarce as well.

The Merced Irrigation District built the remedy with part of the Davis-Grunsky Act funds it received from the Department of Water Resources for recreation and fish enhancement. Under that grant the district guaranteed 180 to 220 cubic feet per second in the river from November to April. The department’s later history adds a second purpose: mitigation for habitat lost to the Crocker-Huffman, Merced Falls and Exchequer dams. The district’s own website points to an older alteration of the river. Gold dredging from the mid-1800s into the mid-1900s stripped the streambed and left the rock piled in rows along the banks.

The project was a spawning channel 4,372 feet long, laid out as one loop of spawning sections and resting pools, and later named the Reuben E. Schmidt Spawning Channel. Water entered from the reservoir behind the dam through a diffusion chamber and welled up evenly, which discouraged fish from jumping and hurting themselves. Salmon came in from the river by a three-step fishway. The channel was designed for 12,000 spawners. Menchen reported it completed in the summer of 1970, and water was first let in on October 20, 1970. Salmon began entering as soon as it filled.

The first season went partly wrong. In early November, water pressure forced out a section of the grill over the diffuser. About 100 salmon passed into the reservoir above the dam, and fishermen caught many of them. Carcass counts did not begin until November 21. After that, crews walked the riffles and drifted the resting pools in a small boat to recover the dead from the bottom.

By mid-April the river was too low for young salmon to reach the sea, and Menchen decided to truck them to the Delta. Fish were held a week at a time in a live box and driven to a release point near the Antioch Bridge. After the second week, in his words, “it was evident outmigrant trapping and trucking was not a paying proposition.” On May 10, crews seined an estimated 30,000 fingerlings from the channel, working through thick mats of algae, and hauled them in a 600-gallon tank truck to the bridge. Menchen put the season’s survival from egg to outmigrant at 38.7 percent.

The dam’s own fish ladder was closed in the 1970s to test whether the channel beside it would serve salmon, steelhead and other fish better. A Fish and Game letter of March 25, 1971, quoted in a later legal opinion, records the request that the district make the dam ladder inoperable so salmon would turn into the channel.

Ponds, silver salmon, and a counting trap

A gravel rearing pond went into use on April 26, 1971, when more than 100,000 Stanislaus River fingerlings arrived from Moccasin Creek Hatchery. In October, 86,000 of them went into the Merced as yearlings. A second pond followed in February 1972. That August a fish culturist was assigned to live at the site; before then, district employees and seasonal Fish and Game aides had run the place.

In the spring of 1972, algae plugged the downstream-migrant screen faster than it could be cleaned. District crews fixed the problem by burying pipes under a gravel dam built across the channel. “The perforated pipes passed the water, the open pipes passed the fish, and the dam held the algae back,” Menchen wrote.

Chester O. Chase reported that use and production in 1973–74 were the highest in the facility’s history. On December 1, 1973, the department and the district agreed on a third pond for silver salmon. The state would keep the first 100,000 fish for an experiment: planting yearlings in Southern California estuaries in an attempt to establish an offshore salmon fishery. The next 10,000 would go to McClure Reservoir for the district. The pond was built in January 1974 and stocked in March with 226,800 fry. Shortly afterward, many of them apparently burrowed through the gravel into the water supply pipe and came out in the spawning channel and the first pond.

Through 1978–79, each run’s size was estimated from redds and carcasses. Beginning in fiscal 1979–80, a trap ran through every spawning season and the fish were counted. The tables in the annual reports run from 99 salmon in 1970–71 up to 1,795 in 1983–84, then back down to 82 in 1989–90.

In the drought of 1989, returning fish were drawn up the San Joaquin by irrigation drain water. The department trapped them at a weir beside the Los Banos Wildlife Area, with electrical cables strung across Salt and Mud sloughs to turn them, and carried the eggs to Merced. That same year the facility supplied eyed eggs to four Merced County elementary schools, the first classroom-incubator projects in the San Joaquin Valley. Dr. Ron Hedrick of the University of California, Davis, also tested the drug Fumagillin DCH there against proliferative kidney disease. On May 11, 1990, more than 118,000 young salmon were moved to the Tuolumne River to clear the way for new raceways and a water line.

Kidney disease, cold water, and a failed experiment

During the 1980s and 1990s the facility was converted into a spawning and rearing hatchery to increase production. The sources date its beginnings differently. The irrigation district’s website says the district built the hatchery with the state wildlife department in the late 1970s. A 2000 assessment of Central Valley Chinook salmon dates the start of operation to 1971.

The yearling program ended after heavy losses to proliferative kidney disease, which is caused by Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, a parasite native to the Merced. In a November 2009 letter, quoted in the same legal opinion, the department said the spawning-channel experiment had failed and that additional management actions were needed for the river’s anadromous fish.

In September 2015, Delta Hydronics and Integrated Aqua Systems supplied a chilling system that uses the cold water leaving the hatchery to pre-chill the river water coming in. During a later drought, emergency funds made available by Governor Brown and the legislature bought temperature-controlled tanks. Sixty rainbow trout rescued from the river lived in them for 18 months. Spawned at the hatchery, they produced hundreds of offspring, and the department returned the fish to the Merced.

A February 2025 engineering study examined 21 department hatcheries for vulnerability to climate change. At Merced it found an intake that clogs with debris and an ultraviolet disinfection system unable to treat the 3 cubic feet per second that runs through the raceways. It also found an incubation building too small to finish early rearing indoors, so undersized fry are moved early to covered outdoor tanks. The alternative the study selected replaces the raceways with circular tanks.

Notable Events

  1. 1970sMID's account places construction of the Merced River Salmon Hatchery, in cooperation with the state wildlife department, in the late 1970s. mercedid.org
  2. 1970Trapped fish were held in the channel, accumulated a week at a time and trucked to a release point near Antioch Bridge. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  3. 1970Water was released into the channel, with flow maintained between 165 and 180 cfs throughout the spawning period. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  4. 1970sThe fish ladder was closed to test whether a spawning channel next to the dam would work better for salmon, steelhead, and other fish. sjvwater.org
  5. 1970Merced Irrigation District completed the original Chinook salmon spawning channel, designed to enhance salmon runs. wildlife.ca.gov
  6. 1971The opinion quotes a Fish and Game letter reporting a request that MID make the dam ladder inoperable so salmon would turn into the constructed spawning channel, as part of restoring Merced River runs. law.justia.com
  7. 1971A rearing pond began operating when more than 100,000 Stanislaus River fingerlings were transferred from Moccasin Creek Hatchery. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  8. 1972A fish culturist was permanently assigned with housing at the facility; seasonal aid provided relief assistance. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  9. 1972A second pond increased rearing capacity to 200,000 yearlings, with 100,000 in each pond. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  10. 1973The Department of Fish and Game and MID made a cooperative agreement concerning construction and operation of a third pond for raising silver salmon. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  11. 1974The third pond was constructed in January and stocked with 226,800 silver-salmon fry in March. Many fry apparently burrowed through gravel into the supply pipe and entered the spawning channel and another pond. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  12. 1979An adult trap was operated throughout each spawning season and actual counts were made. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  13. 1980sMerced Irrigation District expanded the facility to mitigate salmon spawning and rearing habitat lost to the Crocker-Huffman, Merced Falls, and Exchequer dams. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  14. 1986Rearing 1985 brood-year salmon to yearlings was deferred because high spring flows were considered an advantage for releasing all fingerlings in spring. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  15. 1989The facility supplied eyed salmon eggs and technical assistance to four Merced County elementary schools; the report calls these the first such projects in the San Joaquin Valley. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  16. 1989Dr. Ron Hedrick of UC Davis conducted a preliminary study of Fumagillin DCH to control PKD in Chinook salmon. Results were unavailable when the report was prepared. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  17. 1990Over 118,000 Chinook salmon from the facility were moved to the Tuolumne River rearing facility in preparation for construction of new raceways and a water line at Merced. nrm.dfg.ca.gov
  18. 2009The opinion quotes CDFW saying the spawning-channel experiment failed, MID could no longer rely on its earlier letter and additional management actions were necessary for Merced River anadromous fish. law.justia.com
  19. 2015Delta Hydronics supplied a chilling system with Integrated Aqua Systems. Its heat-recovery design used cold outgoing hatchery water to pre-chill incoming river water. deltahydro.com
  20. Emergency drought funds paid for temperature-controlled hatchery tanks. The 60 rescued fish were spawned and eventually produced hundreds of offspring. abc30.com

People

  • Andrew Hughan, Department representative describing the rescued trout's transfer from captivity back to the river.
  • Dean Marston, Department representative describing the drought rescue of rainbow trout held at the hatchery for 18 months.
  • Governor Brown, Made emergency drought funds available with the legislature; those funds purchased temperature-controlled tanks for the hatchery.
  • Dr. Ron Hedrick, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine researcher conducting a preliminary onsite Fumagillin DCH study to control PKD in Chinook salmon (1989-1990 reporting period).
  • Chester 0. Chase, Participated in yearling releases into the Merced River, described in the first-person annual report (1973-1974 reporting period).
  • Reuben E. Schmidt, The facility's spawning channel bears his name; the report calls it the Reuben E. Schmidt Spawning Channel.
  • Robert S. Menchen, Made the operational decision to truck captured juvenile salmon to the Delta when Merced River flow was too low for a safe journey to sea (July 1970-June 1971 reporting period).

Sources

  1. wildlife.ca.gov/Fishing/Hatcheries/Merced-River
  2. wildlife.ca.gov/Fishing/Hatcheries/Merced-River/History
  3. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=32461
  4. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=32460
  5. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=32458
  6. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=32445
  7. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=32442
  8. mercedid.org/environment
  9. waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/bay_delta/california_waterfix/exhibits/docs/CSPA%20et%20al/part2/cspa_234.pdf
  10. deltahydro.com/project-mrh.html
  11. abc30.com/post/hundreds-of-fish-released-into-merced-river/1170707
  12. law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2025/f088084.html
  13. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=15297
  14. mercedid.org/merced-river-instream-and-off-channel-habitat-restoration-project
  15. sjvwater.org/state-and-federal-agencies-want-fish-ladder-restored-on-merced-river
  16. nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=229471